For a known Regressive jurist to coddle convicted murderers and side with the Ninth "Circus" is completely predictable. Understandable, no, but completely predictable. But to question the safety of a lethal drug? Maybe I'm unclear on the concept. It just seems logical that a drug administered to fulfill a condemned prisoner's death sentence would be, by necessity, unsafe. If the drug were safe, it would have difficulty achieving its stated purpose, now wouldn't it? God help us, what has happened to our brains! Educated jurists speculating on whether or not lethal drugs are safe for their intended use is a sure sign our system has abandoned all sanity and common sense.
Anthony Hager on Elana Kagen's first SCOTUS decision. The court was hearing a case on the safety of a lethal injection drug. How exactly did this court case make it to the Supreme Court? Seriously, a lethal injection drug is unsafe? Uh, yeah, it is meant to kill you, of course it is unsafe.
I am not an advocate for the death penalty, matter of fact I strongly oppose it. That being said, what a complete waste of resources to bring this to the high court.
You can read full article here.