You know, we had to expect that this could happen. I really thought that the mandate would go and the balance would stay, therefore forcing congress to either fix or repeal. It seemed to me to be the best way for a judge to handle it. They are not elected and shouldn't be making law. The left had said they thought they could either Scalia and/or Roberts. What I had read about Scalia was quite compelling. He has consistently voted for stretching the commerce clause. Something that I didn't know.
I was down at the court today. It was crazy. I ended up mainly surrounded by supporters of the law, I couldn't get over to the tea party section because of the crowds.
I have more to say, but I need to gather my thoughts more. There are a few things in this ruling that I am happy about. Or, at least in the wording that he used.
This lying sack of shit of a President promised no new taxes ? And according to John Roberts and the rest of the Supreme Court this IS a Tax? You Lib's can have fun with Obamascare,. Me? I'm voting for Mitt Romney, and if Obama and his administration hasn't established a dictatorship by then and. elections no longer required, he will be done!
This lying sack of shit of a President promised no new taxes ? And according to John Roberts and the rest of the Supreme Court this IS a Tax? You Lib's can have fun with Obamascare,. Me? I'm voting for Mitt Romney, and if Obama and his administration hasn't established a dictatorship by then and. elections no longer required, he will be done!
ReplyDelete