Not true! I was there and you picked the few signs that make you're point. There were about 200,000 ppl, it seems, mostly pretty tame. Though much funnier than tea-baggers, of course.
@Mully: But if there had been a few wingnut signs (one, for that matter) at the Beck rally, you would be screaming bloody murder.
Of course, in some regards you are correct. These signs and books could have been easily predicted. For a "non-partisan rally", this one was pretty leftist.
Usual classy Lefty stuff
ReplyDeleteYep it worked, I am now changing my vote,,,,NOT,,,,,Now I am calling even more friends!
ReplyDeleteNot true! I was there and you picked the few signs that make you're point. There were about 200,000 ppl, it seems, mostly pretty tame. Though much funnier than tea-baggers, of course.
ReplyDeleteI would say the majority of the signs were to legalize pot.
ReplyDeleteI was making no point other than these signs are not moderate. Selling books about the muderder Che is not moderate no matter how you cut it.
Nor did I make any generalizations about the crowd. Matter of fact I didn't talk about the crowd at all.
I would say that I am being much more moderate about this rally than left leaning sites are about tea party rallies.
Ah...another anonymous coward with the homo-epithet. Thanks so much for your input and for making my point.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete@Mully: But if there had been a few wingnut signs (one, for that matter) at the Beck rally, you would be screaming bloody murder.
ReplyDeleteOf course, in some regards you are correct. These signs and books could have been easily predicted. For a "non-partisan rally", this one was pretty leftist.
Mully:
ReplyDeletePlease use your foul language somewhere else. This is my sandbox and I get to make the rules.